Upon learning of the resignation yesterday of the President of the neighborhood of Puebla, Mr. Rosillo, which in turn is a member of the Board of PP in Cartagena, think for a moment that the reason for abandoning his post was motivated by The most evident inconsistency that emerges from this case, since Mr. Rosillo has received contracts while Hall was freely designated public office thereof.
However, the resignation occurs seems to be, as has been confirmed by the same Mr Rosillo by the effects it is having research the Court of Auditors regarding the contract awarded to the Maintenance and Custody Archaeological SL from which trade is only administrator Mr. Rosillo.
According to a note issued by the company itself Mr. Rosillo, it has filed an administrative appeal against the City as a result of the investigation initiated by the court, Hall payments to the company are paralyzed, and that is why the Mr. Rosique decides to report the same body whose politically dependent.
SPCT considers that this bizarre situation, evidence misrule living our City, where Mrs. Mayor immersed in legal problems no longer govern, and his subordinates so far, are positioned to try to achieve control of the game no matter at all to use operation of the City Council to settle scores, and that is very serious because it is causing a paralysis at City Hall.
From SPCT we demand the government team of PP to make public the report of the Court of Auditors, which clearly say that time has this report, what kind of irregularities reveals that document, if could have or not, affected companies in the awarding of this contract and if that possible injury, can cause some type of litigation by other companies, which may lead to impairment of the public purse.
Finally from SPCT we reiterate that this matter has responsibility Local Government in full, and especially the Department of Decentralization since it is a direct subordinate of Culture is who proposed the specifications of the contract and the Contract which is that values, and does not rule awarded to the company despite being manifestly incompatible.