The Municipal Citizens Movement (MC), had knowledge of the judgment in Ordinary Procedure 516/2012 of the district court No 1 of Cartagena, which are part CARTAGENA CENTRO, SA and CARTAGENA NEW RESIDENTIAL DOOR , SA, wants to make the following findings, we hope to make and expand at an extraordinary meeting of the Board of Directors of CARTAGENA CENTRO, SA will urge in the coming days.
That does not satisfy the Judgment in any case the public interest, and not done in two specific areas:
The first because it is insufficient, and establishing the amount owed on â‚¬ 2,054,951, while the claim was in excess of three million and a half euros.
And it is not enough because the courts have been lowered by more than 40% of the municipal company claims that could be considered a relative success, but because it is a lower quantification to which the company had sued back in 2006, particularly in September of that year, when it held its Board of Directors (to which we refer later).
It is also because the court has considered, under the test made available, that the "costs of archeology" of society should be taken from the amount to enter, without us evidence that such costs have been refuted by CARTAGENA CENTRO, SA appropriately, and considering that their own municipal officers who testified at trial he attended MC Councilman Jose Lopez, said that they had more than offset in CA4 PERI modifications.
Returning to the quantification of the debt and the test greatly surprised that this group does not appear in the procedure, the agenda and the proposal of the Board of Directors of debt settlement, agreed in the Council are the September 26, 2006, documentation as MC Councilman Jose Lopez, has contributed to the process in which D.
JOSÃ‰ ANTONIO ALONSO CONESA has sued against him, and that the council makes available to the lawyer who represents the local society in the process in which at that time was agreed to propose to CARTAGENA CENTRO, SA 3,005 settlement. â‚¬ 040, or what is the same, 1 million more than the provisions of Judgment and almost 3 million more than in this procedure has admitted CARTAGENA NEW RESIDENTIAL DOOR, SA as debt.
In this sense, we understand that this document, duly assessed by the court, would have resulted in a different judgment, and certainly favor local interests, for their quantification, as we have been talking, but also for the other issue which leaves open the sentence, that is, the end of the contractual relationship, and thus the true account between the parties.
And the judgment not only significantly cut municipal claims, but also opens the door to finally municipal society, upon final liquidation of societies, is forced to return part of the money, on the other hand, know if you will pay, which would not have occurred before the settlement offer in 2006.
Finally, note that we expect Mr. Segado or representative, undertake now, in addition to continuing with this procedure, the vaunted prosecution stated that once stood not to avoid the delay of civil procedure, and he even had response in media by the Prosecutor.